NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1096 MHz versus 954 MHz
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1176 MHz versus 993 MHz
- Environ 63% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 versus 46.273
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 versus 777.677
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 versus 38.196
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.513 versus 82.511
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 versus 4501
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 versus 4501
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz versus 954 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz versus 993 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 versus 46.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 versus 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 versus 38.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 versus 82.511 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 versus 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 versus 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 127.1 GTexel / s versus 47.04 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- 2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,050 gflops versus 1,505 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 versus 3374
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 333 versus 245
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 versus 10982
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.914 versus 3.692
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1611 versus 1231
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s versus 47.04 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops versus 1,505 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 versus 3374 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 versus 245 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 versus 10982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.914 versus 3.692 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3714 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 versus 1231 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3374 | 3818 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 245 | 333 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10982 | 15023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.294 | 46.273 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 795.325 | 777.677 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.692 | 3.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.794 | 38.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.513 | 82.511 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5264 | 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5264 | 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1231 | 1611 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 772 | 773 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1176 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | 1536 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,505 gflops | 3,050 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 47.04 GTexel / s | 127.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | 1 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | 1 | Up to 2048x1536 |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | large |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 160M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
AMDRadeon E8950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 960M vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX330
