NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM versus AMD FirePro W2100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM and AMD FirePro W2100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 924 MHz versus 630 MHz
- Environ 40% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 950 MHz versus 680 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 60.8 GTexel / s versus 13.6 GTexel / s
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 1024 versus 320
- 4.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,946 gflops versus 435.2 gflops
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 5.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 56.869 versus 10.438
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 917.535 versus 289.646
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.351 versus 0.991
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.323 versus 19.794
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 86.304 versus 50.338
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 January 2016 versus 12 August 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz versus 630 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz versus 680 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 60.8 GTexel / s versus 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1024 versus 320 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,946 gflops versus 435.2 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 versus 10.438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 versus 289.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 versus 0.991 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 versus 19.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 versus 50.338 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W2100
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | AMD FirePro W2100 |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 56.869 | 10.438 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 917.535 | 289.646 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.351 | 0.991 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.323 | 19.794 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 86.304 | 50.338 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 871 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 319 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3719 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1494 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2329 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1494 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2329 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1058 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM | AMD FirePro W2100 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GM206 | Oland |
| Date de sortie | 1 January 2016 | 12 August 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1209 | 1211 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 950 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 924 MHz | 630 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,946 gflops | 435.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 320 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 60.8 GTexel / s | 13.6 GTexel / s |
| Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | 1,040 million |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 400 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Low Profile / Half Length | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | n / a |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 OEM vs
ATIRadeon 9800 SE
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 4000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 OEM vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 OEM vs
AMDFirePro W2100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R7 M260X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950 OEM vs
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM
