NVIDIA GeForce MX130 versus Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and Intel UHD Graphics 620 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- 3.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1122 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1242 MHz versus 1150 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 24
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1834 versus 1045
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6520 versus 4586
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 versus 27.062
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 406.203 versus 273.504
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 versus 1.777
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 versus 19.939
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 versus 31.881
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2227
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 versus 1397
- 4.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 versus 878
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2227
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 632 versus 365
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 17 November 2017 versus 1 September 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1122 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1242 MHz versus 1150 MHz |
Pipelines | 384 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1834 versus 1045 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6520 versus 4586 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 versus 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 versus 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 versus 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 versus 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 versus 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 versus 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 versus 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 versus 365 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 30 Watt
- 16x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 244 versus 196
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 30 Watt |
Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 244 versus 196 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1834 | 1045 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 196 | 244 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6520 | 4586 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 27.062 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 273.504 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 1.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 19.939 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 31.881 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 2227 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 1397 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 2227 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 365 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Generation 9.5 |
Nom de code | GM108 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
Date de sortie | 17 November 2017 | 1 September 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1058 | 1383 |
Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1242 MHz | 1150 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1122 MHz | 300 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 24 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 189 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 32 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 / DDR3 | LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
Quick Sync |