NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super versus AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and AMD Radeon Pro SSG pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1470 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1650 MHz versus 1500 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 175 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 7.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16476 versus 10972
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 856 versus 588
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 241.214 versus 170.923
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3870.683 versus 3178.443
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.021 versus 16.732
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1269.445 versus 1231.051
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20969 versus 11029
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20969 versus 11029
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 8 August 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz versus 1500 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16476 versus 10972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 versus 588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 241.214 versus 170.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 versus 3178.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 versus 16.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 versus 1231.051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 versus 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 versus 11029 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Environ 88% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 2176
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.59 versus 160.92
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7766 versus 5567
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7766 versus 5567
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 2176 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 versus 160.92 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7766 versus 5567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7766 versus 5567 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16476 | 10972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 856 | 588 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 87635 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 241.214 | 170.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3870.683 | 3178.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.021 | 16.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 160.92 | 173.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1269.445 | 1231.051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20969 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5567 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5026 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20969 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5567 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5026 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | TU106 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 8 August 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $6,999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 160 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1650 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1470 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 2176 | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 89 C | |
| Pipelines | 2176 | 4096 |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 175 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.8 B | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | 6x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | 4.435” (112.6mm) | |
| Longeur | 9.0” (228.60mm) | 267 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 2-Slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
AMDFireStream 9370
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
IntelArc A580
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
IntelArc A770M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
AMDRadeon RX 6800S
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super vs
IntelArc Pro A60
