NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 200 Watt
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 748 versus 733
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 134.68 versus 118.544
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1155.956 versus 1106.12
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 19811
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3719
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3358
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 19811
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3719
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3358
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 versus 733 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 versus 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1155.956 versus 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Environ 19% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1365 MHz
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1680 MHz
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 15940 versus 14148
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 71677
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 versus 217.59
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 versus 3103.927
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 versus 21.666
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 versus 7482
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 1365 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1680 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15940 versus 14148 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 71677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 versus 217.59 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 versus 3103.927 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 versus 21.666 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 versus 7482 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14148 | 15940 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 | 733 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71677 | 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.59 | 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3103.927 | 4161.764 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.666 | 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 134.68 | 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1155.956 | 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7482 | 10685 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU106 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | $2,299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 158 | 161 |
Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 1920 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |