NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 11% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1365 MHz versus 1230 MHz
- Environ 22% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1680 MHz versus 1380 MHz
- Environ 56% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 160 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14128 versus 8260
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 748 versus 327
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20094 versus 9969
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7442 versus 3521
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6714 versus 3360
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20094 versus 9969
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7442 versus 3521
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6714 versus 3360
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 versus 27 March 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz versus 1230 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz versus 1380 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14128 versus 8260 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 versus 327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 versus 9969 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 versus 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 versus 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 versus 9969 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 versus 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 versus 3360 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 5120 versus 1920
- 5.3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 32 GB versus 6 GB
- 2.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 163446 versus 71667
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 592.008 versus 217.04
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 46.266 versus 21.707
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 versus 133.975
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2169.759 versus 1141.283
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 5120 versus 1920 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 32 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 163446 versus 71667 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 592.008 versus 217.04 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 46.266 versus 21.707 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 versus 133.975 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2169.759 versus 1141.283 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14128 | 8260 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 748 | 327 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 71667 | 163446 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 217.04 | 592.008 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3119.736 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 21.707 | 46.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 133.975 | 271.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1141.283 | 2169.759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20094 | 9969 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7442 | 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6714 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20094 | 9969 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7442 | 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6714 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1246 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Volta |
| Nom de code | TU106 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2019 | 27 March 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 161 | 158 |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1680 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1365 MHz | 1230 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 1920 | 5120 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,131 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 441.6 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 32 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 897.0 GB / s | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon Pro SSG
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000 Embedded
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 vs
AppleM1 Pro 14-core
