NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q versus AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q and AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 7.4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 78123 versus 64683
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 22.794 versus 17.305
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 17328 versus 13848
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 versus 3680
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 versus 3336
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 17328 versus 13848
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 versus 3680
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 versus 3336
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 versus 10 July 2017 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 230 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1890 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 versus 64683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 versus 17.305 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 versus 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 versus 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 versus 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 versus 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
- Environ 36% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1200 MHz versus 885 MHz
- Environ 27% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1500 MHz versus 1185 MHz
- Environ 78% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 2304
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 12844 versus 11748
- Environ 59% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 769 versus 483
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 174.714 versus 168.08
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3924.968 versus 1935.102
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 111.023
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1226.861 versus 1001.496
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz versus 885 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz versus 1185 MHz |
Pipelines | 4096 versus 2304 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12844 versus 11748 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 769 versus 483 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 174.714 versus 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3924.968 versus 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1226.861 versus 1001.496 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11748 | 12844 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 769 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | 64683 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | 174.714 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | 3924.968 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | 17.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | 175.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | 1226.861 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 13848 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3680 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3336 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6839 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | AMD Radeon PRO WX 9100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | TU106 | Vega 10 |
Date de sortie | 29 January 2019 | 10 July 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 178 | 196 |
Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1185 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 885 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | 4096 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 230 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10,800 million | 12,500 million |
Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 384.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1890 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 483.8 GB / s |