NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus AMD Radeon RX 5700
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD Radeon RX 5700 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1465 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1725 MHz
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18253 versus 14501
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99912 versus 66231
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 versus 209.509
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 3686.851
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 21.941
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1036.448
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 11536
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 11536
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1465 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1725 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 versus 14501 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 versus 66231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 versus 209.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 3686.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 21.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 11536 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700
- Environ 19% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 180 Watt versus 215 Watt
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 250 versus 158.103
- 1214.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 8499 versus 7
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt versus 215 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 889 versus 885 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 250 versus 158.103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3723 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3366 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3723 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3366 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8499 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18253 | 14501 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 889 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 | 66231 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 209.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3686.851 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 21.941 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 250 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1036.448 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 11536 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3723 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3366 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 8499 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Nom de code | TU104 | Navi 10 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $350 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 177 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1465 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 10.3 B |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.9 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.95 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 110.4 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 2304 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 248.4 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |