NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1710 MHz
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 3938.377
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1710 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 3938.377 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- Environ 15% de pipelines plus haut: 2944 versus 2560
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18815 versus 18252
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 versus 885
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 versus 99847
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 326.494 versus 293.508
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 31.684 versus 29.145
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 versus 158.103
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 versus 1438.826
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 25232
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3718
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3359
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 25232
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3718
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3359
- 1566.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10966 versus 7
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 2944 versus 2560 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18815 versus 18252 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 versus 885 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 versus 99847 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 versus 293.508 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 versus 29.145 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 versus 158.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 versus 1438.826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 25232 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10966 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18252 | 18815 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 885 | 912 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99847 | 102535 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 159.275 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1506.874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 6293 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 25500 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 6966 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 6293 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 10966 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $699 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 98 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1710 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1515 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 2944 |
Render output units | 64 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 215 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready |