NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1440 MHz
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 912 versus 791
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 102535 versus 74179
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 versus 153.677
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 19571
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3717
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3357
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 19571
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3717
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3357
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 versus 13 August 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1440 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 versus 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 versus 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 versus 153.677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3357 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1710 MHz
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 488.989 versus 326.494
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5451.006 versus 3938.377
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.461 versus 31.684
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1534.582 versus 1506.874
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 versus 10970
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1710 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18872 versus 18811 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 versus 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 versus 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 versus 31.684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 versus 1506.874 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13943 versus 10970 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18811 | 18872 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 912 | 791 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 102535 | 74179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | 488.989 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | 5451.006 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | 41.461 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | 153.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | 1534.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10970 | 13943 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $6,299 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 98 | 112 |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 |