NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1515 MHz versus 1312 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18750 versus 16235
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 908 versus 406
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 159.275 versus 73.167
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1506.874 versus 1253.829
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25500 versus 16337
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6966 versus 3719
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6293 versus 3360
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25500 versus 16337
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6966 versus 3719
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6293 versus 3360
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 versus 21 June 2017 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz versus 1312 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1752 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18750 versus 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 versus 406 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 versus 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 versus 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 versus 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 versus 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 versus 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 versus 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 versus 3360 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
- Environ 74% de pipelines plus haut: 5120 versus 2944
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 176660 versus 105219
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 500.053 versus 326.494
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7209.392 versus 3938.377
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 41.826 versus 31.684
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 5120 versus 2944 |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 176660 versus 105219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 500.053 versus 326.494 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7209.392 versus 3938.377 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.826 versus 31.684 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18750 | 16235 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 908 | 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105219 | 176660 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 326.494 | 500.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3938.377 | 7209.392 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.684 | 41.826 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 159.275 | 73.167 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1506.874 | 1253.829 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25500 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6966 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6293 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25500 | 16337 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6966 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6293 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1752 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Volta |
Nom de code | TU104 | GV100 |
Date de sortie | 20 September 2018 | 21 June 2017 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 105 | 130 |
Prix maintenant | $749.99 | |
Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 32.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1515 MHz | 1312 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2944 | 5120 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 21,100 million |
Performance á point flottant | 14,029 gflops | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 438.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 4096 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 1752 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 897.0 GB / s |