NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q versus AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and AMD Radeon Pro SSG pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 5 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 153.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 5.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13387 versus 10972
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 339.841 versus 170.923
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3898.264 versus 3178.443
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 27.109 versus 16.732
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21278 versus 11029
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 versus 7766
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21278 versus 11029
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 versus 7766
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 8 August 2017 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 153.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13387 versus 10972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 versus 588 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 339.841 versus 170.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3898.264 versus 3178.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.109 versus 16.732 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 versus 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 versus 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 versus 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 versus 7766 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro SSG
- Environ 76% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 817 MHz
- Environ 17% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1500 MHz versus 1282 MHz
- Environ 7% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3840
- 2.7x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 26% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1890 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.59 versus 155.642
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1231.051 versus 1167.569
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 817 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1500 MHz versus 1282 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 3840 |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 6 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1890 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.59 versus 155.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1231.051 versus 1167.569 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro SSG
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro SSG |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13387 | 10972 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 588 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 79058 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 339.841 | 170.923 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3898.264 | 3178.443 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.109 | 16.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 155.642 | 173.59 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1167.569 | 1231.051 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 11029 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 7766 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8234 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | AMD Radeon Pro SSG | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 8 August 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 130 | 158 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $6,999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1282 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 817 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 153.8 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 12,500 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,288 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 6x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 483.8 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | 2048 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 1890 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
AMDFireStream 9370
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
