NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 4 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1282 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 4.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 250 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 versus 3652
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 versus 3290
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 versus 3652
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 versus 3290
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1282 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 versus 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 versus 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 versus 3290 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Environ 23% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 817 MHz
- 9.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 versus 13385
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 versus 589
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137748 versus 79123
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 versus 339.841
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 versus 3898.264
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 versus 27.109
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 versus 155.642
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 versus 1167.569
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 versus 21278
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 versus 21278
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 817 MHz |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 versus 13385 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 versus 589 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 versus 79123 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 versus 339.841 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 versus 3898.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 versus 27.109 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 versus 155.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 versus 1167.569 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 versus 21278 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 versus 21278 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13385 | 19370 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 869 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 79123 | 137748 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 339.841 | 401.574 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3898.264 | 6432.348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.109 | 43.914 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 155.642 | 215.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1167.569 | 2101.927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3290 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 21578 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3290 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8228 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Nom de code | GA106 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 130 | 103 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1282 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 817 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 153.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 12000 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
AMDFireStream 9370
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
