NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 7% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1282 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 4.2x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 60 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8913 vs 3652
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8054 vs 3290
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8913 vs 3652
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8054 vs 3290
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 vs 13 August 2018 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1282 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 vs 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 vs 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 vs 3290 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Etwa 23% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1005 MHz vs 817 MHz
- 9.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
- Etwa 45% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 13385
- Etwa 48% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 589
- Etwa 74% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 137748 vs 79123
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 401.574 vs 339.841
- Etwa 65% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6432.348 vs 3898.264
- Etwa 62% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 43.914 vs 27.109
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 215.219 vs 155.642
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2101.927 vs 1167.569
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 21278
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 21278
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1005 MHz vs 817 MHz |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 vs 13385 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 vs 589 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137748 vs 79123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 vs 339.841 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 vs 3898.264 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 vs 27.109 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 vs 155.642 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 vs 1167.569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 21278 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 21278 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13385 | 19370 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 589 | 869 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79123 | 137748 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 339.841 | 401.574 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3898.264 | 6432.348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 27.109 | 43.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 155.642 | 215.219 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1167.569 | 2101.927 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21278 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8913 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8054 | 3290 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21278 | 21578 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8913 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8054 | 3290 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8228 | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Turing |
Codename | GA106 | TU102 |
Startdatum | 12 Jan 2021 | 13 August 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 130 | 103 |
Typ | Laptop | Workstation |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1282 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 817 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 153.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.846 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 3840 | |
Pixel fill rate | 61.54 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 153.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 60 Watt | 250 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 12000 million | 18,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | Portable Device Dependent | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 2x 8-pin |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 288.0 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 192 bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | |
Technologien |
||
GPU Boost | ||
VR Ready |