NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1130 MHz
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- Environ 13% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 224.6 GTexel/s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 2304
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 17% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 13490
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 871
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 64726
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 207.909
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 3560.776
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 20.486
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 148.938
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 1111.648
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 13621
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 13621
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 1669
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 21 Jan 2020 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1130 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 224.6 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 2304 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 13490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 871 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 64726 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 207.909 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 3560.776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 20.486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 148.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 1111.648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 1669 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- Environ 33% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 200 Watt
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3717 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 13490 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 871 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 64726 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 207.909 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 3560.776 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 20.486 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 148.938 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1111.648 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 13621 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 1669 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
Nom de code | GA104 | Navi 10 XLE |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 21 Jan 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $279 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 210 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1560 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1130 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 449.3 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 14.38 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 7.188 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4864 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 99.84 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 224.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 10300 million |
Unités de Compute | 36 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compte DisplayPort | 3 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5 inches (267 mm) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 350 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | Dual-slot |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |