NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 304.8 GT/s
- Environ 13% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 16357
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 921
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 77476
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 252.601
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 3949.565
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 24.769
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 1322.129
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 14699
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 14699
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 2134
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 7 July 2019 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 304.8 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 14699 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 2134 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 150.943
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 150.943 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3360 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 16357 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 921 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 77476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 2134 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA |
Nom de code | GA104 | Navi 10 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 7 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $400 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 162 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 19.51 TFLOPs |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 9.75 TFLOPs |
Pipelines | 4864 | |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 121.9 GP/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 304.8 GT/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 10.3 B |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |