NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 6% de pipelines plus haut: 4864 versus 4608
- Environ 50% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 16849
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 16849
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 28 Oct 2020 |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 4608 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 16849 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 35% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 648.0 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 25004 versus 20394
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1025 versus 989
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 154220 versus 109075
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 versus 323.141
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 versus 35.311
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 versus 150.943
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 versus 1474.189
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3689 versus 2671
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 648.0 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 8 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25004 versus 20394 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1025 versus 989 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 154220 versus 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 versus 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 versus 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 versus 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 versus 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 versus 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 versus 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3689 versus 2671 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 25004 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 1025 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 154220 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 578.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 52.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 291.971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 2700.97 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3374 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 3689 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Nom de code | GA104 | Navi 21 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $649 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 71 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4864 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 26800 million |
Unités de Compute | 72 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 700 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |