NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1152 MHz
- Environ 18% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1417 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 68.02 GTexel / s
- 6.3x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 768
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 14 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 5320
- 2.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 345
- 5.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 19914
- 6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 54.188
- 4.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1159.046
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 5.507
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 82.067
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 293.638
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 8059
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3579
- 3.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 8059
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3579
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 2219
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 3 January 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1152 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1417 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 68.02 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 4864 versus 768 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 14 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 5320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 345 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 19914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 54.188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 1159.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 5.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 82.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 293.638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 8059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 8059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 2219 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 200 Watt
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 5320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 345 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 19914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 54.188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1159.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 5.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 82.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 293.638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 8059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 8059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 2219 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Nom de code | GA104 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 3 January 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 505 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1417 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1152 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 4864 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 68.02 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 3,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 2,177 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |