NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 10 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 22% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1410 MHz vs 1152 MHz
- Etwa 18% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1417 MHz
- 3721x mehr Texturfüllrate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
- 6.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 4864 vs 768
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 vs 5320
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 345
- 5.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 19914
- 6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 vs 54.188
- 4.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 vs 1159.046
- 6.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 vs 5.507
- Etwa 84% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 vs 82.067
- 5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 vs 293.638
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 vs 8059
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 vs 3579
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 vs 8059
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 vs 3579
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 vs 2219
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 3 January 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz vs 1152 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1417 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 vs 768 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximale Speichergröße | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 vs 5320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 345 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 19914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 vs 54.188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 vs 1159.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 vs 5.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 vs 82.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 vs 293.638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 vs 8059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 vs 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 vs 8059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 vs 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 vs 2219 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- 2.7x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 4x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 7008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7008 MHz vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 5320 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 345 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 19914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 54.188 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1159.046 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 5.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 82.067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 293.638 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 8059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 8059 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 2219 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Pascal |
Codename | GA104 | GP107 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 3 January 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 505 |
Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1417 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1152 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 68.02 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 3,300 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,177 gflops | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | None |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 112.1 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7008 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |