NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1410 MHz versus 1046 MHz
- Environ 53% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1665 MHz versus 1085 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 253.1 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec
- 3.2x plus de pipelines: 4864 versus 1536
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 15% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 230 Watt
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 20394 versus 5939
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 versus 562
- 6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 versus 18068
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 323.141 versus 49.824
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4756.579 versus 1089.67
- 7.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 35.311 versus 4.899
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 150.943 versus 44.06
- 14.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1474.189 versus 103.884
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 27478 versus 7412
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3717 versus 3690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3340
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 27478 versus 7412
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3717 versus 3690
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3340
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2671 versus 2155
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 30 May 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz versus 1046 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz versus 1085 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s versus 134 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 4864 versus 1536 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 versus 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 versus 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 versus 18068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 versus 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 versus 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 versus 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 versus 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 versus 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 versus 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 versus 2155 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7012 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7012 MHz versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 5939 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 562 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 18068 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 49.824 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 1089.67 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 4.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 44.06 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 103.884 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 7412 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 2155 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GA104 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 30 May 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 515 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $449.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 15.45 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1046 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4864 | 1536 |
| Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 134 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 3,540 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,333 gflops | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 98 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 10.5" (26.7 cm) |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 224.3 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 7012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs
NVIDIARTX 3000 Ada Generation
