NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 220 Watt
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 versus 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 220 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 25% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
- Environ 21% de pipelines plus haut: 5888 versus 4864
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 20394
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 989
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 109075
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 323.141
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 4756.579
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 35.311
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 150.943
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 1474.189
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 27478
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3717
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3360
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 27478
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3717
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3360
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 2671
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 317.4 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 5888 versus 4864 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 versus 20394 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 versus 989 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 versus 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 versus 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 4756.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 versus 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 versus 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 versus 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 versus 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 versus 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 versus 2671 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 22253 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 123479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 3163 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA104 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 104 | 44 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1665 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1410 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 4864 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 253.1 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 220 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | 550 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Hauteur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |