NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

  • La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
  • Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 220 Watt
Date de sortie 1 Dec 2020 versus 1 Sep 2020
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt versus 220 Watt

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

  • Environ 6% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1410 MHz
  • Environ 4% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1665 MHz
  • Environ 25% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 317.4 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
  • Environ 21% de pipelines plus haut: 5888 versus 4864
  • Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 versus 20394
  • Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 versus 989
  • Environ 13% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 versus 109075
  • Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 versus 323.141
  • Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 4756.579
  • Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 versus 35.311
  • Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 versus 150.943
  • Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 versus 1474.189
  • Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 versus 27478
  • 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3717
  • 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3360
  • Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 versus 27478
  • 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3717
  • 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3360
  • Environ 18% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 versus 2671
Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau 1500 MHz versus 1410 MHz
Vitesse augmenté 1725 MHz versus 1665 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture 317.4 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
Pipelines 5888 versus 4864
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 22253 versus 20394
PassMark - G2D Mark 999 versus 989
Geekbench - OpenCL 123479 versus 109075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 453.922 versus 323.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5803.174 versus 4756.579
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 40.757 versus 35.311
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 182.055 versus 150.943
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1664.554 versus 1474.189
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 31716 versus 27478
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 13566 versus 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 31930 versus 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 31716 versus 27478
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 13566 versus 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 31930 versus 3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3163 versus 2671

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
20394
22253
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
989
999
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
109075
123479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
323.141
453.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4756.579
5803.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
35.311
40.757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
150.943
182.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1474.189
1664.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27478
31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
31930
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
27478
31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3717
13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3360
31930
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2671
3163
Nom NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark 20394 22253
PassMark - G2D Mark 989 999
Geekbench - OpenCL 109075 123479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 323.141 453.922
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4756.579 5803.174
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 35.311 40.757
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 150.943 182.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1474.189 1664.554
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 27478 31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3717 13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3360 31930
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 27478 31716
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3717 13566
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3360 31930
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2671 3163

Comparer les caractéristiques

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

Essentiel

Architecture Ampere Ampere
Nom de code GA104 GA104
Date de sortie 1 Dec 2020 1 Sep 2020
Prix de sortie (MSRP) $399 $499
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 104 44
Genre Desktop Desktop

Infos techniques

Vitesse augmenté 1665 MHz 1725 MHz
Vitesse du noyau 1410 MHz 1500 MHz
Processus de fabrication 8 nm 8 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 16.20 TFLOPS 20.31 TFLOPS
Pipelines 4864 5888
Pixel fill rate 133.2 GPixel/s 165.6 GPixel/s
Taux de remplissage de la texture 253.1 GTexel/s 317.4 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 200 Watt 220 Watt
Compte de transistor 17400 million 17400 million

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Facteur de forme Dual-slot Dual-slot
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Longeur 242 mm (9.5 inches) 242 mm, 9.5 inches
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) 350 Watt 550 Watt
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires 1x 12-pin 1x 12-pin
Largeur 112 mm (4.4 inches) 112 mm, 4.4 inches
Hauteur 112 mm (4.4 inches)

Soutien API

DirectX 12.2 12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenCL 2.0 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.5 6.7
Vulkan

Mémoire

RAM maximale 8 GB 8 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire 448 GB/s 448.0 GB/s
Largeur du bus mémoire 256 bit 256 bit
Vitesse de mémoire 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Genre de mémoire GDDR6 GDDR6