NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 10% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 220 Watt
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Etwa 6% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1500 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Etwa 4% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 25% höhere Texturfüllrate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- Etwa 21% höhere Leitungssysteme: 5888 vs 4864
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22429 vs 20566
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 124736 vs 107393
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 452.561 vs 313.695
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 4580.983
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.794 vs 35.994
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 184.548 vs 137.972
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1634.218 vs 1474.189
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 27478
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3717
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3360
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 27478
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3717
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3360
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13597 vs 11644
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 vs 4864 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22429 vs 20566 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1000 vs 998 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 124736 vs 107393 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 452.561 vs 313.695 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 4580.983 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.794 vs 35.994 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 184.548 vs 137.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1634.218 vs 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 13597 vs 11644 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20566 | 22429 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 998 | 1000 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107393 | 124736 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 313.695 | 452.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4580.983 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.994 | 40.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 137.972 | 184.548 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1634.218 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11644 | 13597 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $499 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 100 | 43 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 220 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | 550 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Höhe | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |