NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 10% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 220 Watt
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 vs 1 Sep 2020 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Etwa 6% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1500 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Etwa 4% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 25% höhere Texturfüllrate: 317.4 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- Etwa 21% höhere Leitungssysteme: 5888 vs 4864
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 22253 vs 20394
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 999 vs 989
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 123479 vs 109075
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 453.922 vs 323.141
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 vs 4756.579
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 40.757 vs 35.311
- Etwa 21% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 182.055 vs 150.943
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1664.554 vs 1474.189
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31716 vs 27478
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3717
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3360
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31716 vs 27478
- 3.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3717
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3360
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3163 vs 2671
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 317.4 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 5888 vs 4864 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 22253 vs 20394 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 999 vs 989 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 123479 vs 109075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 453.922 vs 323.141 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 vs 4756.579 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 40.757 vs 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 182.055 vs 150.943 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1664.554 vs 1474.189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31716 vs 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31716 vs 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3163 vs 2671 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20394 | 22253 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 | 999 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 | 123479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4756.579 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1474.189 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2671 | 3163 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 1 Dec 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $399 | $499 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 104 | 44 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1410 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 4864 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 133.2 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 253.1 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt | 220 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 350 Watt | 550 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Höhe | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |