NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 17% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1350 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 23666 versus 21788
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 versus 936
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 versus 41.133
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 versus 23659
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 versus 3358
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 versus 23659
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 versus 3718
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 versus 3358
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14960 versus 14599
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 20 September 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1350 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23666 versus 21788 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 versus 936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 versus 41.133 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 versus 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 versus 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14960 versus 14599 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 16% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 290 Watt
- 11.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 394.035 versus 342.287
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 173.697 versus 146.214
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1987.605 versus 1807.647
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 290 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138717 versus 138671 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 versus 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 versus 146.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 versus 1807.647 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23666 | 21788 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 936 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138671 | 138717 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 394.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 41.133 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 173.697 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 1987.605 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 23659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14960 | 14599 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
Nom de code | GA104 | TU102 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 20 September 2018 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $999 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 56 | 83 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz | 1350 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 6144 | |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 339.8 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 608.3 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X |