AMD Radeon Pro W6600 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro W6600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro W6600
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 2200 MHz versus 1575 MHz
- Environ 64% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2903 MHz versus 1770 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 130 Watt versus 290 Watt
- Environ 47% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 15778 versus 8897
- 5.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 42325 versus 8004
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 15778 versus 8897
- 5.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 42325 versus 8004
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 2200 MHz versus 1575 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2903 MHz versus 1770 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt versus 290 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 versus 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 versus 8004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 versus 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 versus 8004 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Environ 5% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 339.8 GTexel/s versus 325.1 GTexel/s
- 3.4x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 1792
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 23553 versus 15500
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1046 versus 974
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 137779 versus 72987
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 342.287 versus 270.025
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 versus 20.735
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 146.214 versus 135.303
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 versus 1054.582
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 versus 20826
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 versus 20826
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 339.8 GTexel/s versus 325.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 1792 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23553 versus 15500 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1046 versus 974 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 137779 versus 72987 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 versus 270.025 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 versus 20.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 versus 135.303 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 versus 1054.582 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 versus 20826 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 versus 20826 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro W6600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15500 | 23553 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 974 | 1046 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 72987 | 137779 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.025 | 342.287 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4980.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 20.735 | 42.369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 135.303 | 146.214 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1054.582 | 1807.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20826 | 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 15778 | 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 42325 | 8004 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20826 | 31420 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 15778 | 8897 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 42325 | 8004 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14994 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro W6600 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
Nom de code | Navi 23 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 8 Jun 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | $599 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 65 | 62 |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 2903 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Unités de Compute | 28 | |
Vitesse du noyau | 2200 MHz | 1575 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 650.3 GFLOPS (1:16) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.81 TFLOPS (2:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.40 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1792 | 6144 |
Pixel fill rate | 185.8 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 325.1 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 290 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11060 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 224 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |