NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 12% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1410 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1770 MHz versus 1665 MHz
- Environ 34% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 339.8 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s
- Environ 26% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 4864
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 23670 versus 20548
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 versus 996
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138729 versus 107110
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 342.287 versus 311.869
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 versus 35.311
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 146.214 versus 125
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 versus 1477.456
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 versus 27478
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 versus 3360
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 versus 27478
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 versus 3717
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 versus 3360
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14960 versus 11653
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 versus 1 Dec 2020 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1410 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz versus 1665 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 339.8 GTexel/s versus 253.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 4864 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23670 versus 20548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 versus 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138729 versus 107110 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 versus 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 versus 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 versus 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 versus 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 versus 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 versus 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 versus 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 versus 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14960 versus 11653 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Environ 45% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 290 Watt
- Environ 47% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 290 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23670 | 20548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138729 | 107110 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14960 | 11653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA104 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | $399 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 56 | 101 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 339.8 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 290 Watt | 200 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | 350 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 608.3 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |