NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 6 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 12% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1575 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Etwa 6% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- Etwa 34% höhere Texturfüllrate: 339.8 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s
- Etwa 26% höhere Leitungssysteme: 6144 vs 4864
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23670 vs 20548
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 996
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 138729 vs 107110
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 342.287 vs 311.869
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 42.369 vs 35.311
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 146.214 vs 125
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1807.647 vs 1477.456
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 vs 27478
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 vs 3717
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 vs 3360
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 vs 27478
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 vs 3717
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 vs 3360
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 14960 vs 11653
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1575 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 339.8 GTexel/s vs 253.1 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 vs 4864 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23670 vs 20548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138729 vs 107110 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 vs 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 vs 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 vs 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 vs 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 vs 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 vs 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 vs 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 vs 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14960 vs 11653 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Etwa 45% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 200 Watt vs 290 Watt
- Etwa 47% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 290 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 23670 | 20548 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 138729 | 107110 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 342.287 | 311.869 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 42.369 | 35.311 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 146.214 | 125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1807.647 | 1477.456 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 | 27478 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14960 | 11653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $599 | $399 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 56 | 101 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1575 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 21.75 TFLOPS | 16.20 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 169.9 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 339.8 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 290 Watt | 200 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 242 mm (9.5 inches) |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | 350 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 608.3 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |