NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile versus AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 2560
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 115 Watt versus 230 Watt
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 371.785 versus 349.422
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 26295 versus 15315
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 26295 versus 15315
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 6144 versus 2560 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 versus 349.422 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 versus 15315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 versus 15315 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 2321 MHz versus 1110 MHz
- Environ 67% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2581 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 39% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 413.0 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7129.567 versus 3552.807
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 34.064 versus 31.212
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 197.183 versus 190.723
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1699.337 versus 1422.602
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 18062 versus 9367
- 5.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 50772 versus 8604
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 18062 versus 9367
- 5.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 50772 versus 8604
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 Mar 2021 versus 12 Jan 2021 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2321 MHz versus 1110 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2581 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 413.0 GTexel/s versus 296.6 GTexel/s |
| Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 8 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7129.567 versus 3552.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 34.064 versus 31.212 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 197.183 versus 190.723 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1699.337 versus 1422.602 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 18062 versus 9367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 50772 versus 8604 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 18062 versus 9367 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 50772 versus 8604 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 371.785 | 349.422 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3552.807 | 7129.567 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 31.212 | 34.064 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 190.723 | 197.183 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1422.602 | 1699.337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 26295 | 15315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 9367 | 18062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8604 | 50772 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 26295 | 15315 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 9367 | 18062 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8604 | 50772 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19886 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 941 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 97113 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 12774 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GA104 | Navi 22 |
| Date de sortie | 12 Jan 2021 | 3 Mar 2021 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 92 | 46 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $479 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1110 MHz | 2321 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS (1:64) | 825.9 GFLOPS (1:16) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1) | 26.43 TFLOPS (2:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 148.3 GPixel/s | 165.2 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | 413.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 17200 million |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Hauteur | PCIe 4.0 x16 | 40 mm (1.6 inches) |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | |
| Largeur | 110 mm (4.3 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448.0 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 192 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| GPU Boost | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro GV100
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A6000
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6650M
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6850M XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 6300
