NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 2 mois plus tard
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1440 MHz versus 720 MHz
- 2.3x plus de vitesse augmenté: 1710 MHz versus 758 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 465.1 GTexel/s versus 80.6 billion / sec
- 6.5x plus de pipelines: 8704 versus 1344
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 10 GB versus 4 GB
- 7.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 25146 versus 3278
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 versus 351
- 17.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 167014 versus 9444
- 16.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 versus 28.081
- 6.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 versus 879.575
- 18.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 versus 2.823
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 versus 40.155
- 23.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 versus 99.75
- 27.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 versus 1263
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 2409
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 versus 3111
- 27.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 versus 1263
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 2409
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 versus 3111
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 versus 4 June 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz versus 720 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz versus 758 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.1 GTexel/s versus 80.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 8704 versus 1344 |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 28 nm |
Taille de mémore maximale | 10 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 versus 3278 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 versus 351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 versus 9444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 versus 28.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 versus 879.575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 versus 2.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 versus 40.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 versus 99.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 versus 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 versus 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3111 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- 3.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 320 Watt
- Environ 52% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1800 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 320 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz versus 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 | 3278 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 | 9444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 28.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 879.575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 2.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 40.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 99.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3111 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
Nom de code | GA102 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 4 June 2012 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $310.50 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 56 | 1018 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Prix maintenant | $499.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1710 MHz | 758 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1440 MHz | 720 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8704 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 465.1 GTexel/s | 80.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,038 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Hauteur | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | None |
Largeur | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 API |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 10 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 760.3 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 320 bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI | ||
TXAA |