NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 2x more core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 720 MHz
- 2.3x more boost clock speed: 1710 MHz vs 758 MHz
- 5770.5x more texture fill rate: 465.1 GTexel/s vs 80.6 billion / sec
- 6.5x more pipelines: 8704 vs 1344
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 10 GB vs 4 GB
- 7.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 25146 vs 3278
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1053 vs 351
- 17.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 167014 vs 9444
- 16.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 457.414 vs 28.081
- 6.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6022.79 vs 879.575
- 18.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 51.221 vs 2.823
- 4.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 175.219 vs 40.155
- 23.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2381.93 vs 99.75
- 27.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34537 vs 1263
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 2409
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3111
- 27.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34537 vs 1263
- Around 54% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 2409
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3111
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 vs 4 June 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 720 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz vs 758 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s vs 80.6 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 8704 vs 1344 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
Maximum memory size | 10 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 vs 3278 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 vs 351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 vs 9444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 vs 28.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 vs 879.575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 vs 2.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 vs 40.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 vs 99.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 vs 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 vs 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3111 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 320 Watt
- Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 320 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25146 | 3278 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1053 | 351 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 167014 | 9444 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 457.414 | 28.081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6022.79 | 879.575 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 51.221 | 2.823 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 175.219 | 40.155 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2381.93 | 99.75 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34537 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34537 | 1263 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 2409 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3111 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4420 | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
Code name | GA102 | GK104 |
Launch date | 1 Sep 2020 | 4 June 2012 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $310.50 |
Place in performance rating | 56 | 1018 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Price now | $499.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 8.46 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1710 MHz | 758 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 720 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 465.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 29.77 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 8704 | 1344 |
Pixel fill rate | 164.2 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 465.1 GTexel/s | 80.6 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 320 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 28300 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1344 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,038 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 285 mm, 11.2 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 12-pin | None |
Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 API |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 760.3 GB/s | 115.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 320 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective | 1800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6X | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
SLI | ||
TXAA |