NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 ans 0 mois plus tard
- 2.4x plus de vitesse du noyau: 2505 MHz versus 1024 MHz
- 2.2x plus de vitesse augmenté: 2640 MHz versus 1188 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 316.8 GTexel/s versus 49.2 billion / sec
- 5x plus de pipelines: 3840 versus 768
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 4 nm versus 28 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- 375x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective versus 6.6 GB/s
- 6.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 101650 versus 16728
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1081 versus 641
- 3.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19722 versus 5340
- 21.9x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2302 versus 105
- 5.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 311.253 versus 60.473
- 7.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 33.932 versus 4.279
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 169.697 versus 29.738
- 6.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1500.926 versus 231.508
- 8.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 6622.553 versus 758.865
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 2023 versus 20 August 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2505 MHz versus 1024 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 2640 MHz versus 1188 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 316.8 GTexel/s versus 49.2 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 3840 versus 768 |
| Processus de fabrication | 4 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective versus 6.6 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 versus 16728 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 versus 641 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 versus 5340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 versus 105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 versus 60.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 versus 4.279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 versus 29.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 versus 231.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 versus 758.865 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 90 Watt versus 200 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 90 Watt versus 200 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 101650 | 16728 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1081 | 641 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19722 | 5340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2302 | 105 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.253 | 60.473 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 33.932 | 4.279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 169.697 | 29.738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1500.926 | 231.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6622.553 | 758.865 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6803 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6803 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Nom de code | AD106 | GM206 |
| Date de sortie | 2023 | 20 August 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 75 | 547 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | |
| Prix maintenant | $194.44 | |
| Genre | Desktop | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 2640 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 2505 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 316.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 20.28 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 126.7 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 316.8 GTexel/s | 49.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 90 Watt |
| Noyaux CUDA | 768 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,825 gflops | |
| Compte de transistor | 2,940 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 550 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 6-pins |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Longeur | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 2x | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 288.0 GB/s | 105.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 6.6 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 12GB GA104
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
IntelArc A750
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4060 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700
