NVIDIA NVS 310 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA NVS 310 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 310
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 45% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 20 Watt versus 29 Watt
- 1750x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 179 versus 131
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 2.991 versus 2.471
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 7.835 versus 4.053
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 918 versus 835
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1229 versus 1155
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 918 versus 835
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1229 versus 1155
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 26 June 2012 versus 2 April 2012 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt versus 29 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 versus 131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.991 versus 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.835 versus 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 918 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1229 versus 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 918 versus 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1229 versus 1155 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
- Environ 55% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 523 MHz
- Environ 55% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 6.5 billion / sec versus 4.184 GTexel / s
- Environ 55% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 155.5 gflops versus 100.4 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1024 MB versus 512 MB
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 versus 263
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1283 versus 880
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 77.99 versus 76.391
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 6.018 versus 4.974
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 555 versus 431
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 555 versus 431
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 523 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.5 billion / sec versus 4.184 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 155.5 gflops versus 100.4 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1024 MB versus 512 MB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 322 versus 263 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1283 versus 880 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 77.99 versus 76.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 6.018 versus 4.974 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 555 versus 431 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 555 versus 431 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 310
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA NVS 310 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 263 | 322 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 179 | 131 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 880 | 1283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 2.991 | 2.471 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 76.391 | 77.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 0.233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 4.974 | 6.018 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 7.835 | 4.053 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 431 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 918 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1229 | 1155 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 431 | 555 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 918 | 835 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1229 | 1155 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 87 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA NVS 310 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 610 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GF119 | GF119 |
| Date de sortie | 26 June 2012 | 2 April 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $159 | $39.99 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1596 | 1626 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $39.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.13 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 523 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 100.4 gflops | 155.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 48 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 4.184 GTexel / s | 6.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 292 million | 292 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 48 | |
| Température maximale du GPU | 102 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI, VGA |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 156 mm | 5.7" (14.5 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Hauteur | 2.7" (6.9 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 512 MB | 1024 MB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz | 1.8 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| CUDA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA NVS 310 avec des autres
NVIDIANVS 310 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 770M
NVIDIANVS 310 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 230M
NVIDIANVS 310 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 620 OEM
NVIDIANVS 310 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8470 OEM
NVIDIANVS 310 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 505 OEM
NVIDIANVS 310 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8180
