NVIDIA NVS 315 versus ATI Radeon HD 5570

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA NVS 315 and ATI Radeon HD 5570 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA NVS 315

versus

ATI Radeon HD 5570

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA NVS 315

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 4 mois plus tard
2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 19 Watt versus 39 Watt
Environ 75% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz versus 1000 MHz

Date de sortie	10 March 2013 versus 11 October 2011
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt versus 39 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz versus 1000 MHz

Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5570

Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 650 MHz versus 523 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 13 GTexel / s versus 4.184 GTexel / s
8.3x plus de pipelines: 400 versus 48
5.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 520.0 gflops versus 100.4 gflops
Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 478 versus 320
Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 198 versus 180
Environ 55% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1370 versus 882
Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 4.393 versus 3.025
3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 235.572 versus 79.479
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.454 versus 0.217
2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 11.345 versus 4.705
7.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.016 versus 6.573
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1160 versus 465
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1883 versus 942
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 1382
2.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1160 versus 465
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1883 versus 942
2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 1382

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	650 MHz versus 523 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	13 GTexel / s versus 4.184 GTexel / s
Pipelines	400 versus 48
Performance á point flottant	520.0 gflops versus 100.4 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	478 versus 320
PassMark - G2D Mark	198 versus 180
Geekbench - OpenCL	1370 versus 882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	4.393 versus 3.025
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	235.572 versus 79.479
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.454 versus 0.217
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	11.345 versus 4.705
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	49.016 versus 6.573
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1160 versus 465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1883 versus 942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3360 versus 1382
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1160 versus 465
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1883 versus 942
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3360 versus 1382

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA NVS 315
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5570

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

320

478

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

180

198

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

882

1370

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.025

4.393

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

79.479

235.572

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.217

0.454

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

4.705

11.345

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.573

49.016

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

465

1160

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

942

1883

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1382

3360

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

465

1160

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

942

1883

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1382

3360

Nom	NVIDIA NVS 315	ATI Radeon HD 5570
PassMark - G3D Mark	320	478
PassMark - G2D Mark	180	198
Geekbench - OpenCL	882	1370
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	3.025	4.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	79.479	235.572
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.217	0.454
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	4.705	11.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	6.573	49.016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	465	1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	942	1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	1382	3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	465	1160
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	942	1883
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	1382	3360

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA NVS 315	ATI Radeon HD 5570
Essentiel
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	TeraScale 2
Nom de code	GF119	Turks
Date de sortie	10 March 2013	11 October 2011
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$159
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1577	1369
Genre	Workstation	Desktop
Conception		ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	523 MHz	650 MHz
Performance á point flottant	100.4 gflops	520.0 gflops
Processus de fabrication	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	48	400
Taux de remplissage de la texture	4.184 GTexel / s	13 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	19 Watt	39 Watt
Compte de transistor	292 million	716 million
Vitesse augmenté		650 MHz
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DMS-59	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
Soutien de DisplayPort
Soutien de Dual-link DVI
VGA
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Longeur	145 mm	165 mm
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	None
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	11
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Mémoire
RAM maximale	1 GB	1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	14 GB / s	25.6 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1750 MHz	1000 MHz
Genre de mémoire	DDR3	DDR3
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity