NVIDIA Quadro K2200 versus AMD FirePro M4100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K2200 and AMD FirePro M4100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K2200
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 56% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1046 MHz versus 670 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 44.96 GTexel / s versus 16.08 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- 2.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,439 gflops versus 514.6 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- 3.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3567 versus 1059
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12020 versus 5067
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.695 versus 15.905
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 588.094 versus 432.116
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.205 versus 1.48
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.455 versus 24.029
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 166.26 versus 74.162
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 16 October 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz versus 670 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s versus 16.08 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops versus 514.6 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3567 versus 1059 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 versus 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 versus 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 versus 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 versus 1.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 versus 24.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 versus 74.162 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M4100
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 versus 547
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3591 versus 1577
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3361 versus 1671
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3591 versus 1577
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3361 versus 1671
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 versus 547 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3591 versus 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 1671 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3591 versus 1577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 1671 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | AMD FirePro M4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3567 | 1059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 547 | 623 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12020 | 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.695 | 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 588.094 | 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.205 | 1.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.455 | 24.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 166.26 | 74.162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4921 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1577 | 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1671 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4921 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1577 | 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1671 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1193 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 | AMD FirePro M4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GM107 | Mars |
Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 16 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $395.75 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 805 | 806 |
Prix maintenant | $343.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.01 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1046 MHz | 670 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,439 gflops | 514.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 44.96 GTexel / s | 16.08 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 68 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Longeur | 202 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.19 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration |