NVIDIA Quadro K420 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K420 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K420
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 22% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 41 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 24.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1245 versus 51
- 12.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 598 versus 47
- 20.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1241 versus 59.6
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 versus 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 598 versus 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1241 versus 59.6 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
- Environ 24% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1085 MHz versus 876 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.72 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 192
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 833.3 gflops versus 336.4 gflops
- 1024x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 1 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 1782 MHz
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.243 versus 5.977
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 393.811 versus 186.605
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.966 versus 0.345
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 18.793 versus 10.363
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.139 versus 17.254
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3011 versus 1245
- 4.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2916 versus 598
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3335 versus 1241
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1085 MHz versus 876 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.72 GTexel / s versus 14.02 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 833.3 gflops versus 336.4 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 1 GB versus 1 GB / 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 1782 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.243 versus 5.977 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 393.811 versus 186.605 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.966 versus 0.345 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.793 versus 10.363 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.139 versus 17.254 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3011 versus 1245 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2916 versus 598 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3335 versus 1241 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K420
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 746 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 280 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1792 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.977 | 10.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 186.605 | 393.811 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.345 | 0.966 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.363 | 18.793 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 17.254 | 19.139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1245 | 3011 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 598 | 2916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1241 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1245 | 51 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 598 | 47 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1241 | 59.6 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro K420 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 22 July 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $96.67 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1470 | 1471 |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 10.27 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 876 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 336.4 gflops | 833.3 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 14.02 GTexel / s | 34.72 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 41 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | DVI-I DP, 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 160 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Largeur | 1" (2.5 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB / 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1782 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | 128 Bit | GDDR5 |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Desktop Management | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro K420 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 320 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7350 OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 820M
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M335DX
NVIDIAQuadro K420 vs
AMDRadeon R7 Graphics
