NVIDIA Quadro K5100M versus Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro K5100M and Intel HD Graphics P4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 mois plus tard
- 2.2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 771 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 5.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3072 versus 605
- 3.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11544 versus 3385
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 355.305 versus 146.479
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.706 versus 10.689
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 34.772 versus 6.64
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 3342
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3362 versus 3345
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 3342
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3362 versus 3345
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 versus 1 June 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 versus 605 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11544 versus 3385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 versus 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 versus 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 versus 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3345 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 22 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 19% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 84 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 2.6x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 963 versus 366
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.915 versus 5.972
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.178 versus 1.022
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 22 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 84 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 963 versus 366 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 versus 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 versus 1.022 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3072 | 605 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 366 | 963 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11544 | 3385 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 5.972 | 8.915 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 355.305 | 146.479 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.022 | 1.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.706 | 10.689 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 34.772 | 6.64 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 | 3345 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6747 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3342 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 | 3345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Generation 7.5 |
Nom de code | GK104 | Haswell GT2 |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 1 June 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 761 | 685 |
Prix maintenant | $309.99 | |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz | 350 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,369 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 22 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 98.69 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 84 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 392 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | IGP |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 115.2 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3600 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |