NVIDIA GRID K520 versus NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GRID K520 and NVIDIA Quadro K5100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GRID K520
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 98.69 GTexel / s
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 1536
- 2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 2,448 gflops versus 2,369 gflops
- Environ 39% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 3600 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 versus 3163
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 20.97 versus 5.972
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 versus 355.305
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.244 versus 1.022
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 versus 15.706
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 76.158 versus 34.772
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 versus 6747
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 versus 6747
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 98.69 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 1536 |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,448 gflops versus 2,369 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 3600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 versus 3163 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 versus 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 versus 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 versus 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 versus 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 versus 34.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 versus 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 versus 6747 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 771 MHz versus 745 MHz
- 2.3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 225 Watt
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 363 versus 160
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 11751 versus 10864
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 771 MHz versus 745 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 363 versus 160 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11751 versus 10864 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3362 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3362 versus 3354 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K520
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3516 | 3163 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 160 | 363 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10864 | 11751 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.97 | 5.972 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1063.784 | 355.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.244 | 1.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.277 | 15.706 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 76.158 | 34.772 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6782 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6782 | 6747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3362 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GRID K520 | NVIDIA Quadro K5100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
Nom de code | GK104 | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | 23 July 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $3,599 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 763 | 764 |
Genre | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Prix maintenant | $309.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.80 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 745 MHz | 771 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,448 gflops | 2,369 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec | 98.69 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | 3,540 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2x 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 115.2 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 2x 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 3600 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |