NVIDIA Quadro M1000M versus AMD FirePro M4100
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro M1000M and AMD FirePro M4100 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 993 MHz versus 670 MHz
- Environ 98% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 31.78 GTexel / s versus 16.08 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 98% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,017 gflops versus 514.6 gflops
- Environ 25% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz
- 2.7x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2835 versus 1059
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8849 versus 5067
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 38.33 versus 15.905
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 721.18 versus 432.116
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.056 versus 1.48
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.938 versus 24.029
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 137.786 versus 74.162
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3591
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3591
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 versus 16 October 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz versus 670 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s versus 16.08 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,017 gflops versus 514.6 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 4000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 versus 1059 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 versus 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 versus 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 versus 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 versus 1.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 versus 24.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 versus 74.162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3591 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M4100
- 1024x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 623 versus 307
Caractéristiques | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 2 GB / 4 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 versus 307 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3358 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD FirePro M4100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2835 | 1059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 307 | 623 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8849 | 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 38.33 | 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 721.18 | 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.056 | 1.48 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 42.938 | 24.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 137.786 | 74.162 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4196 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4196 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3591 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3361 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1002 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M | AMD FirePro M4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GM107 | Mars |
Date de sortie | 18 August 2015 | 16 October 2013 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $200.89 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 806 | 809 |
Prix maintenant | $203.37 | |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Mobile workstation |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 16.10 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1072 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 993 MHz | 670 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,017 gflops | 514.6 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.78 GTexel / s | 16.08 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Taille du laptop | large | medium sized |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB / 4 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
AppAcceleration |