NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 73% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 730 MHz
- Environ 74% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1354 MHz versus 780 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 46.56 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- 2.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,490 gflops versus 599.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 50 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 4.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 versus 896
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 304
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 versus 5684
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 versus 12.111
- 3.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 versus 253.178
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 versus 1.211
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 23.777
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 versus 73.506
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 versus 1645
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 2426
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 1677
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 versus 1645
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 2426
- 4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 1677
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 30 June 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 730 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz versus 780 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s versus 18.72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops versus 599.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 50 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 versus 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 versus 5684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 versus 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 versus 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 versus 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 versus 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 versus 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 versus 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 1677 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 896 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 304 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 5684 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 12.111 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 253.178 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 1.211 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 23.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 73.506 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 1677 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 1645 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 2426 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 1677 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GP107 | Oland |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 30 June 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 1199 |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | 780 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 730 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 18.72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 50 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 28.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |