NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus AMD Radeon R9 M290X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and AMD Radeon R9 M290X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 49% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 850 MHz
- Environ 50% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1354 MHz versus 900 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 100 Watt
- 4.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3640 versus 3256
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 547 versus 430
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 2581
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 2526
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 2581
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 2526
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 9 January 2014 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 850 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 100 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3640 versus 3256 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 547 versus 430 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 2581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 2526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 2581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 2526 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M290X
- Environ 55% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 72 GTexel / s versus 46.56 GTexel / s
- 2.5x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 512
- Environ 55% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,304 gflops versus 1,490 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 23514 versus 12475
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 51.022 versus 43.877
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 936.497 versus 773.248
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.62 versus 3.082
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 77.584 versus 53.425
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 258.046 versus 184.343
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6666 versus 3575
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6666 versus 3575
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 72 GTexel / s versus 46.56 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1280 versus 512 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,304 gflops versus 1,490 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23514 versus 12475 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 51.022 versus 43.877 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 936.497 versus 773.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.62 versus 3.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 77.584 versus 53.425 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 258.046 versus 184.343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6666 versus 3575 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6666 versus 3575 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M290X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD Radeon R9 M290X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3640 | 3256 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 547 | 430 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 23514 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 51.022 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 936.497 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 5.62 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 77.584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 258.046 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 6666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 2581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 2526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 6666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 2581 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 2526 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro P620 | AMD Radeon R9 M290X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | GP107 | Neptune |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 9 January 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 596 | 598 |
Prix maintenant | $176.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | 900 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 850 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 512 | 1280 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 100 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 2,800 million |
Unités de Compute | 20 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore |