NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 81% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 700 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 46.56 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,490 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- Environ 23% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 49 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 3.1x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1600 MHz
- 4.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 versus 830
- 2.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 253
- 4.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 versus 2902
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 versus 10.872
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 versus 166.832
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 versus 0.817
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 12.415
- 5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 versus 36.916
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 versus 1951
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 1693
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 3324
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 versus 1951
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 1693
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 3324
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 18 June 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 700 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s versus 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops versus 692.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 49 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 versus 830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 versus 2902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 versus 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 versus 166.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 versus 0.817 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 12.415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 versus 36.916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 versus 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 versus 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 3324 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 2902 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 10.872 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 166.832 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 0.817 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 12.415 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 36.916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 3324 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GF108 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 18 June 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 1311 |
| Prix maintenant | $176.99 | $54.99 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | 20.48 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 692.7 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 14.43 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 585 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 40.1 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P620 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
