NVIDIA Quadro P620 versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro P620 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P620
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 27% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1266 MHz versus 993 MHz
- Environ 47% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 46.56 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- Environ 95% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,490 gflops versus 762.6 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 40 Watt versus 64 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3670 versus 1469
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 549 versus 349
- 2.9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12475 versus 4271
- 3.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 43.877 versus 11.994
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 773.248 versus 291.627
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.082 versus 1.023
- 3.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.425 versus 15.139
- 7.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 184.343 versus 23.651
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3575 versus 1790
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3881 versus 1427
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6631 versus 2153
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3575 versus 1790
- 2.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3881 versus 1427
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 6631 versus 2153
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 versus 29 May 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz versus 993 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s versus 31.78 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops versus 762.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt versus 64 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 versus 1469 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 versus 349 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 versus 4271 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 versus 11.994 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 versus 291.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 versus 1.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 versus 15.139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 versus 23.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 versus 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 versus 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 versus 2153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 versus 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 versus 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 versus 2153 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P620
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3670 | 1469 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 549 | 349 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 12475 | 4271 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 43.877 | 11.994 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 773.248 | 291.627 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.082 | 1.023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.425 | 15.139 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 184.343 | 23.651 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3575 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3881 | 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6631 | 2153 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3575 | 1790 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3881 | 1427 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 6631 | 2153 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 513 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro P620 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP107 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2018 | 29 May 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 583 | 1270 |
| Prix maintenant | $176.99 | $94.99 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 25.53 | 18.87 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $89 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1354 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1266 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,490 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 46.56 GTexel / s | 31.78 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 64 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 1,270 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 145 mm | 145 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64.19 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro P620 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 6500
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4850
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 4830
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M620 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro P620 vs
AMDRadeon R9 350
