NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 9 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 175.0 GTexel/s versus 283.4 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 180 Watt
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 68305 versus 52556
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 220.867 versus 150.103
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.026 versus 14.035
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 94.532 versus 27.417
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 15 August 2016 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s versus 283.4 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 180 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 versus 52556 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 versus 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 versus 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 versus 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 versus 27.417 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- 2.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1607 MHz versus 600 MHz
- Environ 46% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1771 MHz versus 1215 MHz
- Environ 11% de pipelines plus haut: 2560 versus 2304
- Environ 33% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 8 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 versus 645.647
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 versus 10140
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 versus 3706
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 versus 3351
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 versus 10140
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 versus 3706
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 versus 3351
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1607 MHz versus 600 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1771 MHz versus 1215 MHz |
Pipelines | 2560 versus 2304 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 6 GB |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 versus 645.647 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 versus 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 versus 10140 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8366 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 343 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68305 | 52556 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 220.867 | 150.103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2046.214 | 2036.763 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.026 | 14.035 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.532 | 27.417 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 645.647 | 819.934 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10140 | 20151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 4646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 4195 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10140 | 20151 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 4646 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 4195 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7217 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU106 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 325 | 280 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $439.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1215 MHz | 1771 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 600 MHz | 1607 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 175.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 11.20 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 5.599 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 77.76 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 175.0 GTexel/s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 180 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 10800 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Performance á point flottant | 9,068 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Largeur | IGP | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 Bit |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10 GB/s | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |