NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- 3.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 250 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 20 September 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 versus 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 versus 3358 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
- Environ 43% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1350 MHz versus 945 MHz
- Environ 12% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1380 MHz
- Environ 79% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 935 versus 522
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 21784 versus 11170
- 2.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 138583 versus 64556
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23659 versus 14496
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23659 versus 14496
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1350 MHz versus 945 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1380 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 935 versus 522 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 21784 versus 11170 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 138583 versus 64556 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23659 versus 14496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23659 versus 14496 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 522 | 935 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11170 | 21784 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 64556 | 138583 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14496 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14496 | 23659 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 | 3358 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 394.035 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5461.22 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.133 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 173.697 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1987.605 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 14599 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | N19E-Q1 | TU102 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 20 September 2018 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 231 | 83 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $999 | |
| Prix maintenant | $1,279.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.22 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1380 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 945 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 198.7 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.72 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 6.359 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 88.32 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 198.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10800 million | 18,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | Large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIATesla P40
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P5000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 3000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
