NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 110 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 versus 11691
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 versus 14998
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 versus 14998
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 14 March 2019 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt versus 120 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 versus 11691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 versus 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 versus 14998 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Environ 48% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 1035 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 versus 705
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 1035 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 versus 705 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 versus 3714 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 782 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 11691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 14998 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3717 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3717 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 5414 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU116 |
| Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 14 March 2019 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 175 | 241 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1785 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1035 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 296.6 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 6,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Largeur | IGP | |
| Longeur | 229 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 16 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 295X2
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 5700
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 64X
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs
IntelArc A730M
