NVIDIA RTX A4000 versus AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A4000 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 6144 versus 4608
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 16849
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 16849
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 versus 28 Oct 2020 |
Pipelines | 6144 versus 4608 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 300 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 16849 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- 2.5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1825 MHz versus 735 MHz
- Environ 44% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 2250 MHz versus 1560 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 648.0 GTexel/s versus 299.5 GTexel/s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 7 nm versus 8 nm
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 25095 versus 19404
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1020 versus 992
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 150126 versus 122542
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 578.52 versus 420.465
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 52.561 versus 32.297
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 291.971 versus 162.131
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2700.97 versus 1895.111
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3374 versus 3355
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3374 versus 3355
- Environ 74% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19417 versus 11190
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1825 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 2250 MHz versus 1560 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 648.0 GTexel/s versus 299.5 GTexel/s |
Processus de fabrication | 7 nm versus 8 nm |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 25095 versus 19404 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1020 versus 992 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 150126 versus 122542 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 578.52 versus 420.465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 52.561 versus 32.297 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 291.971 versus 162.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2700.97 versus 1895.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3374 versus 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3374 versus 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19417 versus 11190 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19404 | 25095 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 992 | 1020 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 122542 | 150126 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 578.52 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 52.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 291.971 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 2700.97 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3374 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 16849 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3374 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11190 | 19417 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
Nom de code | GA104 | Navi 21 |
Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | 28 Oct 2020 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 105 | 62 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz | 2250 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 1825 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 7 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 1296 GFLOPS (1:16) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 41.47 TFLOPS (2:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 20.74 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 6144 | 4608 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 288.0 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s | 648.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt | 300 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 17400 million | 26800 million |
Unités de Compute | 72 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | 700 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 2x 8-pin |
Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) |
Hauteur | 50 mm (2 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |