NVIDIA RTX A6000 versus NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA RTX A6000 and NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A6000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 18% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1455 MHz versus 1230 MHz
- Environ 35% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1860 MHz versus 1380 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 625.0 GTexel/s versus 441.6 GTexel / s
- 2.1x plus de pipelines: 10752 versus 5120
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 48 GB versus 32 GB
- Environ 14% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1752 MHz
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 200330 versus 163132
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 737.53 versus 592.008
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 59.432 versus 46.266
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2347.314 versus 2169.759
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 23142 versus 9969
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3712 versus 3521
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 23142 versus 9969
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3712 versus 3521
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 versus 27 March 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz versus 1230 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz versus 1380 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s versus 441.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 10752 versus 5120 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 48 GB versus 32 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) versus 1752 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 versus 163132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 versus 592.008 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 versus 46.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 versus 2169.759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 versus 9969 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 versus 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 versus 9969 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 versus 3521 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
- Environ 20% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 250 Watt versus 300 Watt
- Environ 95% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8260 versus 4237
- 3.8x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 327 versus 86
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 271.318 versus 189.702
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt versus 300 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8260 versus 4237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 versus 86 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 271.318 versus 189.702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4237 | 8260 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 86 | 327 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200330 | 163132 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 737.53 | 592.008 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 59.432 | 46.266 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 189.702 | 271.318 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2347.314 | 2169.759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 23142 | 9969 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 23142 | 9969 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3521 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3360 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 17833 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA RTX A6000 | NVIDIA Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Volta |
| Nom de code | GA102 | GV100 |
| Date de sortie | 5 Oct 2020 | 27 March 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $4649 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 97 | 170 |
| Genre | Workstation | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1860 MHz | 1380 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1455 MHz | 1230 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 1250 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 40.00 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 10752 | 5120 |
| Pixel fill rate | 208.3 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 625.0 GTexel/s | 441.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 21,100 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 14,131 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 8-pin EPS | 2x 8-pin |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 48 GB | 32 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 768 GB/s | 897.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1752 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA RTX A6000 avec des autres
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIATITAN RTX
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
NVIDIARTX A2000
NVIDIARTX A6000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600
