NVIDIA T400 versus AMD Radeon Vega 11
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA T400 and AMD Radeon Vega 11 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA T400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 40% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 420 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 10% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 1300 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.20 GTexel/s versus 57.2 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 17% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 35 Watt
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16965 versus 13226
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 versus 41.582
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 versus 371.843
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 versus 3.156
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 versus 52.449
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 versus 2156
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 versus 2156
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 versus 13 February 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 420 MHz versus 300 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 1300 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s versus 57.2 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 35 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16965 versus 13226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 versus 41.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 versus 371.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 versus 3.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 versus 52.449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 versus 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 versus 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3343 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Vega 11
- Environ 83% de pipelines plus haut: 704 versus 384
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 248.838 versus 222.15
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2475 versus 2173
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2475 versus 2173
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 704 versus 384 |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 248.838 versus 222.15 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2475 versus 2173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2475 versus 2173 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Vega 11
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA T400 | AMD Radeon Vega 11 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16965 | 13226 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 41.582 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 371.843 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 3.156 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 52.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 248.838 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3343 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 2156 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 2475 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3343 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1842 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 487 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA T400 | AMD Radeon Vega 11 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Nom de code | TU117 | Owl |
Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 | 13 February 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 901 | 903 |
Genre | Desktop | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 420 MHz | 300 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 704 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s | 57.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 4,940 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,830 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | IGP |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.00 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | System Shared |