NVIDIA T400 versus NVIDIA Quadro P400
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA Quadro P400 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA T400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1425 MHz versus 1252 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.20 GTexel/s versus 21.25 GTexel / s
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 384 versus 256
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- 5.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17019 versus 3053
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 versus 19.856
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 versus 309.824
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 versus 1.38
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 versus 25.011
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 versus 84.489
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 versus 2709
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3328
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 versus 2709
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3328
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 versus 7 February 2017 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz versus 1252 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s versus 21.25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 256 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 versus 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 versus 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 versus 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 versus 1.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 versus 25.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 versus 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 versus 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 versus 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3328 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro P400
- 2.9x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1228 MHz versus 420 MHz
- 3.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4012 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 versus 2173
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 versus 2173
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1228 MHz versus 420 MHz |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4012 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 versus 2173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 versus 2173 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P400
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17019 | 3053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 19.856 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 309.824 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 1.38 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 25.011 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 84.489 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 2709 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 2875 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3328 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1651 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 435 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU117 | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 | 7 February 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 851 | 983 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Prix maintenant | $119.99 | |
Genre | Workstation | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1252 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 420 MHz | 1228 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 256 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s | 21.25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 30 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
Performance á point flottant | 679.9 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Longeur | 145 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.00 GB/s | 32.1 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 64 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 4012 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |