NVIDIA Tesla T4 versus AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla T4 and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1005 MHz versus 926 MHz
- Environ 26% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1515 MHz versus 1206 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 14 nm
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 120 Watt
- Environ 52% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 6600 MHz
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10616 versus 7965
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 33787
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 127.622 versus 111.543
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 1817.005
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 9.511
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 versus 99.875
- Environ 78% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 511.362
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 9983
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1781 versus 1674
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 9983
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1781 versus 1674
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 versus 4 August 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz versus 926 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz versus 1206 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 6600 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 versus 7965 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 versus 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 versus 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 versus 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 versus 1674 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 versus 592
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2443 versus 1976
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2443 versus 1976
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 versus 592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 versus 1976 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 | 7965 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 723 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | TU104 | Ellesmere |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 | 4 August 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 270 | 389 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Conception | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
Génération GCN | 4th Gen | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $179 | |
Prix maintenant | $109.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 926 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 5,700 million |
Unités de Compute | 32 | |
Performance á point flottant | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 154.4 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 211 GB/s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |