NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 926 MHz
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1515 MHz vs 1206 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 52% higher memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 6600 MHz
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10616 vs 7965
- Around 81% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 33787
- Around 14% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 127.622 vs 111.543
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1817.005
- Around 98% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 9.511
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 99.875
- Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 511.362
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 9983
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1781 vs 1674
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 9983
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1781 vs 1674
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 4 August 2016 |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 926 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz vs 1206 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 6600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 vs 7965 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 vs 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 vs 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 vs 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 vs 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 vs 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 vs 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 vs 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 vs 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 vs 1674 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 723 vs 592
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2443 vs 1976
- Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2443 vs 1976
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 723 vs 592 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2443 vs 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2443 vs 1976 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 | 7965 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 723 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 33787 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 111.543 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 1817.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 9.511 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 99.875 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 511.362 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 1674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 9983 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 2443 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 1674 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 842 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | AMD Radeon RX 470 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | TU104 | Ellesmere |
Launch date | 13 September 2018 | 4 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 270 | 389 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 400 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Price now | $109.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 100.00 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1206 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 926 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 5,700 million |
Compute units | 32 | |
Floating-point performance | 4.9 TFLOPs | |
GPU Power | 85-110 Watt | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Texture fill rate | 154.4 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
Length | 241 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 6600 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 211 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
CrossFire | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
ZeroCore |